Is the U.K. Guardian Tricking SEOs?
Before you think a link is golden, think again!
For those of you who are frequent link prospectors, you’ll often run into what you consider the mother lode. This is a seemingly untapped link that - with the right coaxing and ’strategery’ (thank you, GWB) - you can turn your new homestake into a golden bonanza for your target site.
For the right prospect - let’s say a ballpark PageRank 6-8 with strong backlinks - you’re willing to invest considerable time and resources. For some of you, getting a link on a PageRank 8 is a must, by hook or by crook (I do not condone “by crook”).
The easiest way, which is generating all the buzz lately, has been blog comments. Google clearly indicates that blog comments are a relatively white hat practice (with one or two caveats). Remember: Your comments should be relevant and on-topic!
For example, let’s just say you find a blog or news page with dofollow comments. You spend a good 20-30 minutes reading the entry and typing in an insightful comment (of course, with a link back to your target page). Shazam! You’re well on your way to a valid PR8 backlink — or so you think.
So where does the Guardian come into this?
The U.K. Guardian’’s cleverly (deceptively?) entitled community blog, “CommentIsFree,” may or may not have been on your radar. I know it was on mine. My plugins were all indicating dofollow comments. The page was being cached every day by Google. And spammers had not yet discovered this beautiful opportunity.
My ma’ always said: “Nothing in life is ‘Free.’”
That was all before I looked under the hood. The title “CommentIsFree” was a blatant bait-and-switch phrase intended to send SEOs on a wild goose chase. Comments were not — in fact — free. The links were hidden behind a snippet of JavaScript. I looked at the text version of the Google cache and the comment links were nowhere to be seen. It seems as if the Guardian is capitalizing on the dofollow blog movement to hurt the SEO industry (whether or not its intentionally malicious is up to the U.K. Guardian to elucidate).
So, moral of the story: be familiar with good ol’ fashioned “View Source.” Plugins that show whether or not a link is dofollow are convenient for first inspections, but it could also lead to fruitless and time-consuming endeavors. The U.K. Guardian is just one of many cases in point.
I’m on to your ways, U.K. Guardian! You underestimated the intelligence of the average SEO.
June 19th, 2008 at 4:26 am
I seem to spend a lot of time standing up for The Guardian at the moment (despite having my own issues with how they have represented SEO, intentionally or unintentionally). The name CommentIsFree is nothing to do with bait & switch. It’s taken from a quote by CP Scott, who was a famous editor, and owner, of The Guardian in the late 19th/early 20th Century.
He said: Comment is free, but facts are sacred.
It’s right there in the masthead of the site.
As to the javascript issue, you’ve kind of answered your own question. They don’t want people commenting to get links, they want people commenting because they have something to say. And whilst your comment might be insightful, they’re more interested in the intent (or at least that’s what I assume - I have no connection with them and so can not speak for them).
I’m not saying that I wouldn’t like their comments to be really dofollow, but I can see why they’re not.